Meningiomas account for about 25% of primary intracranial tumours. Meningiomas occur most commonly in middle-aged and elderly patients with a peak during the sixth and seventh decades. The term meningioma was coined by Harvey Cushing in 1922
when he reported 85 cases of meningioma. In 1932 Cushing & Eisenhardt
reported a series of 313 patients with meningioma encountered between 1903
& 1932.
In 1932 Cushing wrote “ There is to day nothing in the whole realm of surgery more gratifying than the successful removal of a meningioma with subsequent functional recovery.” Most of meningiomas are cured if completely removed.
In 1932 Cushing wrote “ There is to day nothing in the whole realm of surgery more gratifying than the successful removal of a meningioma with subsequent functional recovery.” Most of meningiomas are cured if completely removed.
The anatomical distribution of intracranial meningiomas is as
approximately as follows:
Convexity ( Frontal , Parietal , Occipital , Temporal ) Commonest
Parasagittal ( Anterior 1/3rd, Middle or posterior one third)
Falcine Meningioma (Anterior 1/3rd, Middle or posterior one third)
(arises from the falx, completely concealed by overlying cortex, & initially does not involve the superior sagittal sinus but later may involve the sinus).
Falcine meningiomas can be divided into anterior, middle and posterior types. Anterior third extends from the crista galli to the coronal suture, the middle third from coronal suture to the lambdoid suture and posterior third from the lambdoid suture to the torcula.
Shenoid ridge or sphenoid wing meningioma ( Pterional, Alar
or Clinoidal)
Olfactory groove meningioma
Tuberculum sellae ( 5% to 10% of intracranial meningiomas)Olfactory groove meningioma
Intraventricular ( 1% of all meningomas, 90% are located at the trigone of lateral ventricle)
Cavernous sinus meningioma
Meningioma of the optic nerve and orbit
Infratentorial : Cerebellopontine angle , petroclival, jugular foramen, foramen magnum and basal meningiomas.
Pathology
Meningioma arises from arachnoid cap cells. The arachnoid villi protrude into the venpous sinuses. The venous endothelium is in contact with some arachnoid villi cells ( arachnoid cap cells ).
Meningioma is usually a slow growing, extraaxial and well circumscribed tumor.
Usually benign ( 32% of incidentally discovered meningiomas do not grow over 3 years follow up ).
Typically tumor has broad based attachment on dura and enchances densely.
Intratumoral calcification is very common.
Classic histological finding is the presence of psammoma bodies.
Meningiomas are multiple in 8% of cases.
Occasionally meningioma forms a diffuse sheet of tumor over the dura and is known as meningioma en plaque.
GRADE 1
Meningothelial ( Syncytial) meningioma
Fibrous ( Fibroblastic) meningioma
Transitional ( Mixed) meningioma
Psammomatous meningioma
Angiomatous meningioma
Microcystic meningioma
Secretory meningioma
Lymphoplasmacyte- rich meningioma
Metaplastic meningioma
Meningiomas with greater likelihood of recurrence and/or aggressive behavior are WHO grade II & grade III meningiomas
Meningiomas with greater likelihood of recurrence and/or aggressive behavior are WHO grade II & grade III meningiomas
GRADE II
Atypical meningioma
Clear cell meningioma
Chordoid meningioma
GRADE III
Rhabdoid meningioma
Papillary meningioma
Anaplastic ( Malignant ) meningioma
In year 2016, World Health Organization has published an updated version of classification of tumors of central nervous system. The new classification is both a conceptual and practical advance over its 2007 predecessor. For the first time , the WHO classification uses molecular parameters in addition to histology. So, the new classification is a combined genotype and phenotype classification. But the classification and grading of meningiomas did not undergo revisions except for the introduction of brain invasion as a criterion for the diagnosis of atypical meningioma, WHO grade II.
So, the 2016 WHO classification of Meningiomas is as follows:
In year 2016, World Health Organization has published an updated version of classification of tumors of central nervous system. The new classification is both a conceptual and practical advance over its 2007 predecessor. For the first time , the WHO classification uses molecular parameters in addition to histology. So, the new classification is a combined genotype and phenotype classification. But the classification and grading of meningiomas did not undergo revisions except for the introduction of brain invasion as a criterion for the diagnosis of atypical meningioma, WHO grade II.
So, the 2016 WHO classification of Meningiomas is as follows:
Meningioma
Meningothelial
meningioma
Fibrous meningioma
Transitional
meningioma
Psammomatous
meningioma
Angiomatous meningioma
Microcystic
meningioma
Secretory meningioma
Lymphoplasmacyte-rich
meningioma
Metaplastic meningioma
Chordoid
meningioma
Clear cell meningioma
Atypical meningioma
Papillary
meningioma
Rhabdoid
meningioma
Anaplastic (
malignant) meningioma
Radiological Features of Meningioma :
Plain radiography usually shows hyperostosis, increased
vascular markings and calcification
CT scan : Meningioma is an extraaxial lesion [( there is no parenchyma all round the tumor, as on one side it is based over the dura ( bone)]. A well marginated , isodense to slightly hyperdense lesion, homogenously and intensely enhancing , with associated brain edema . Tumor is extraaxial lesion with broad base against a bony structure or dural margin. The involved dura also enhances on contrast administration ( Dural tail sign).The bone adjacent to the dural base may show bony erosion or hyperostosis.
MRI brain with contrast and digital substraction angiography (DSA) are the other investigations for the operative planning for intracranial meningiomas.
MRI brain should always be done before the surgery as it provides
better anatomical details and also gives a clue about the vascularity and type
of meningioma. It is indispensible in
cases of CP angle tumor, Clinodial meningioma, etc.CT scan : Meningioma is an extraaxial lesion [( there is no parenchyma all round the tumor, as on one side it is based over the dura ( bone)]. A well marginated , isodense to slightly hyperdense lesion, homogenously and intensely enhancing , with associated brain edema . Tumor is extraaxial lesion with broad base against a bony structure or dural margin. The involved dura also enhances on contrast administration ( Dural tail sign).The bone adjacent to the dural base may show bony erosion or hyperostosis.
MRI brain with contrast and digital substraction angiography (DSA) are the other investigations for the operative planning for intracranial meningiomas.
Treatment goal : Complete Surgical Excision.
Sometimes it is not possible to completely excise the lesion
due to its location. Under these conditions a subtotal resection should be done
to aim for the complete functional recovery. As meningioma is relatively a
benign lesion and remaining tumor takes long time to recur, the safe limit of
resection may be done.
Simpson classification of extent of resection for intracranial
meningima
Grade 1 Gross total resection of tumor, dural attachment and involved abnormal
boneGrade II Gross total resection of tumor & coagulation of dural attachment
Grade III Gross total ( Macroscopic ) resection of tumor
Grade IV Subtotal ( Partial ) resection
Grade V Simple decompression
References:
H.Richard Winn’s Youmans Neurological surgery, Schmidek & Sweet operative Neurosurgical techniques.
Greenberg M.S., Handbook of neurosurgery, 7th ed. Thieme
WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system,2007 ( 4th ed)
WHO classification of tumor of central nervous system, 2016 update
Review article : David N.Louis et al. The 2016 World health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol ( 2016) , 131: 803-820.
H.Richard Winn’s Youmans Neurological surgery, Schmidek & Sweet operative Neurosurgical techniques.
Greenberg M.S., Handbook of neurosurgery, 7th ed. Thieme
WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system,2007 ( 4th ed)
WHO classification of tumor of central nervous system, 2016 update
Review article : David N.Louis et al. The 2016 World health organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol ( 2016) , 131: 803-820.
No comments:
Post a Comment